Herpes dating positive singles
They had to fill out the profile details and it also asked about the kind of disease that they had, whether it was HIV or STD or something else.
One thing that was weird in this form was that it was written that by accepting the terms and condition the candidates would be allowing the site to publish this data to other websites.
The lawyer of the plaintiff went on to say that his client was not aware of that the defendant here was engaged in such activities and it was a gross violation of the right. He simply said that the action performed by the defendant in this instance was like if someone was putting their profiles on Jdate and seeing that somehow their profiles have come up on Christian Mingle and that too without their knowledge.
The bigger problem was that these details also included their medical condition that they mentioned in their profiles for
So in a sense by accepting the terms in this form he was accepting that was allowed to use his details as and when required.
The plaintiff contented that most of the candidates do not read the terms and just click on it as most of the agreement terms are similar and this was a peculiar occurrence.
This company was known to run a number of different websites among which was one.
Another business of the company was to help people set up their own website which was also a part of their affiliate scheme.
Amidst a huge uproar from privacy activists the jury found the defendant guilty on the charges of misleading statements and proposed $ 1.5 million in compensatory damages and punitive damages in the tune of $ 15 million.This is done to protect the privacy of the person and this is the standard arrangement done by any website and ever more stringently if it is a herpes dating site.The whole lawsuit against was based on this simple fact that the information of one of the candidates on the site was posted to another site without prior permission.It was alleged that the owner of the site shared pictures and other details to another site when there was a confidential agreement in place.The verdict favoured the plaintiff and he won this class action suit which earned him 16.5 million dollars.
The problem with the arrangement was that they offered software and database assistance but they didn’t exactly keep a tab on the information that was taken from the website.